Pickle Publishing
|
Fr. Revolution in Prophecy |
Research Papers
|
Return to https://www.pickle-publishing.com/papers/french-revolution.htm.
[The following letter by William Miller presents what used to be the typical
evangelical interpretation of Revelation 11. See also the "7
Trumpet Chart" and "The
Seven Trumpets of Revelation: Were the Later Reformers Right?"]
Remarkable Fulfillment of Prophecy,
Relating to France and the "Two Witnesses"
Quotations from Eminent Expositors of Prophecy, with
Remarks by Mr. Miller
DEAR BRO. HIMES: I send you a few
extracts from some ancient authors on the subject of the "two
witnesses." Please to give them a place in your new work, and you
will oblige many.
I. I shall quote Dr. Thomas Goodwin, president of the
Magdalen College, Oxford, who wrote an exposition of Revelation in A.D.
1639, more than two hundred years since. On Rev.xi.13, he remarks:
By the tenth part of the city, I understand some one tenth part of
Europe. By earthquake here is meant a great concussion or shaking of
states, politic, or ecclesiastical. By this earthquake' so falling out
in a tenth part of the city, this tenth part of it is so shaken that it
falls; that is, ceaseth to be a tenth part of the city, or to belong to
its jurisdiction any longer. The effect of this earthquake, and fall of
this tenth part of the city, is killing seven thousand of the names of
men. Now, by men of name, in scripture, is meant men of title, office and
dignity; these having killed the witnesses, themselves are to be killed,
by being bereft of their names and titles, which are to be rooted out
forever. Now which of these ten kingdoms (may be intended,) it is not hard
to conjecture. The saints and churches of France, God has made a
wonder unto me in all his proceedings towards them, first and last; and
there would seem some great and special honor reserved for them, yet, at
the last; for it is certain that the first light of the gospel, by the
first and second angel's preaching, in Rev.xiv., which laid the
foundation of Antichrist's ruin, was out from among them, namely those
of Lyons, and other places in France. And they bore and underwent the
great heat of that morning of persecution, which was as great, if not
greater, than any since. And so, as that kingdom had the first great
stroke, so now it should have the honor of having the last great stroke in
the ruin of Rome.
So much for Dr. Goodwin. And who has read the history
of the French revolution, but will acknowledge that these extracts breathe
a spirit of prophecy, literally fulfilled in about one hundred and fifty
years afterwards?
I will next quote Dr. H. Moore. In his book,
"MYSTERY OF INIQUITY contained in the kingdom of Antichrist,"
Book 2, ch. 12, on Rev.xi.13, he observes:
That an earthquake
signifies political commotions and change of affairs, is obvious to any
one; but that the city here mentioned should be understood not of a city
of brick or stone, but a polity. For I conceive it is plain enough
that this city is the very city mentioned in the eighth verse, which is
called the great city, and this great city is the whore of Babylon, and
the whore of Babylon is nothing but the body of the idolatrous clergy in
the empire, who appertain to the seventh or last head of the beast, which
is an head of blasphemy, as well as the six first, that is to say, an
idolatrous head. Whence we may understand what is meant by these seven
thousand names of men; for neither seven nor thousand signify any
determinate number, but only the nature or property of these names of
men that are said to be slain, namely, that they are TITLES,
DIGNITIES, OFFICES OR ORDERS of men belonging to the state of Christendom.
As under the seventh head, that is become idolatrous and antichristian,
and this number seven is multiplied into a thousand, it
signifies a perfect nulling of all such offices and orders
of men; for no men at all here are necessarily implied to be slain,
but only all antichristian OFFICES and FRATERNITIES to be dissolved and
abrogated, and things to be reduced to the purity of the first four
hundred years. For to slay by a diorismus, signifies nothing else
but a causing a thing to cease to be. This, but little question, is
the true meaning of this place. And the tenth part of the city will have a
sense marvellously coincident therewith.
The above sentiment was published by Dr. Moore, A.D.
1663. In a little more than a hundred and thirty years afterwards it
became a matter of fact, instead of prophecy and opinion. No one need to
be informed, that one of the ten kingdoms of western Rome, or of Papacy,
France, abolished all titles and orders in one day or decree, in A.D. 1793
or 1794.
I will now give you a few extracts from REV. PETER JURINE, a minister of the French church at Rotterdam, taken from a work
entitled "The Accomplishment of Scripture Prophecies, or the
approaching Deliverance of the Church." This work was translated into
English in the year 1687, more than one hundred and fifty years ago. He
says, Part II. page 68,
We shall see such admirable agreement
between the events and the prophecies explained, that shall abundantly
convince that what I am about to say is not simple conjecture.
Page 242, on Rev.xi.13, he says,
There shall be an earthquake, that
is, a great emotion and trouble in the world, and in the antichristian
kingdom. In this emotion a tenth part of the city shall fall; that is, a
tenth part of the antichristian kingdom shall be taken away from it. Now
what is the tenth part of the city which shall fall? In my opinion we
cannot doubt that it is France. This kingdom is the most considerable part
or piece of the ten horns, or states, which once made up the great Babylon
city. It fell. This does not signify that the French monarchy shall
be ruined; but it may be humbled; but in all appearance, Providence
does design for her afterwards a great elevation. It is highly
probable that God will not let go unpunished the horrible outrages which
it acts at this day (of persecution.)
Afterward, it must build its greatness upon the
ruins of the papal empire, and enrich itself with the spoils of those who
shall take part with the Papacy. They who persecute the Protestants, know
not where God is leading them: this is not the way by which he will lead
France to the height of glory. If she comes thither, it is because she
shall shortly change her road. Her greatness will be no damage to
Protestant states; on the contrary, the Protestant states shall be
enriched with the spoils of others, and be strengthened by the fall of
Antichrist's empire. This tenth part of the city shall fall
with respect to the Papacy; it shall break with Rome, and the Roman
religion. One thing is certain, that the Babylonian empire shall
perish through the refusal of obedience by the ten kings, who had given
their power to the beast. The thing is already come to pass in
part. The kingdoms of Sweden, Denmark, England, and the states of Germany,
have withdrawn themselves from the jurisdiction of the Pope. They have
spoiled the harlot of her riches. They have eaten her flesh, that is,
seized on her benefices and revenues which she had in their countries.
This must go on, and be finished as it is begun. The kings who yet
remain under the empire of Rome, must break with her, leave her solitary
and desolate. But who must begin this last revolt? It is most probable
that FRANCE shall. Not Spain, which is as yet under the clergy, and
plunged in superstition and under tyranny as much as ever. Not the
emperor, who in temporals is subject to the Pope, and permits that in his
states the archbishop of Strigonium should teach that the Pope can take
away the imperial crown from him. It cannot be any country but France.
How can it be possible that this servant of God could,
without a prophetic spirit, so exactly describe events more than a hundred
years before they were literally fulfilled? I beg of you, my brethren of
the ministry, read this over again; compare it with the history of Europe
for fifty years past. Why will you be so unbelieving? Are you not ashamed
of your unbelief, when you see the faith, boldness, and honesty of this
French Protestant, who lived in the days of persecution when the world
wondered after the beast? Oh Lord God! what will become of our stallfed,
indolent, unbelieving, hypocritical, and proud clergy of the present day?
Do they believe any scripture is fulfilling at the present day? No. They
are blind and cannot see afar off; they love to slumber, they will not
bark. And if any of thy servants do lift up their voices, these will only
murmur in their nests, and dream on, I fear, into eternity. Oh God! awaken
us to a sense of our awful danger.
Again, he says,
Seeing that the tenth part of the
city that must fall is France, this gives me some hopes that the death of
the 'two witnesses' hath a particular relation to this kingdom. It is
the street or place of this city, that is, the most fair and eminent part
of it. The witnesses must remain dead upon this street, and upon it they
must be raised again. And, as the death of the witnesses and their
resurrection have a relation to the kingdom of France, it may well fall
out that we are not far distant from the time.
On page 50, speaking
of the time, he says "that it will fall on the year 1785."
On
page 279, he says,
If I should be mistaken nine or ten years, - I do
not think that any could justly treat me as a false prophet, and
accuse me of rashness.
In another place, he says,
And in the
earthquake were slain of men seven thousand; in the Greek it is names
of men, not seven thousand men. I confess that this seems somewhat
mysterious: in other places we find not this phrase, names of men, put
simply for men. Perhaps there is here a figure of grammar called hypallage
casus, so that names of men are put for men of name, that
is, of raised or considerable quality, be it on account of riches,
dignity, or of learning. But I am more inclined to say, that here these
words, names of men, are put for men of name, and must be
taken in their natural signification, and do intimate that the total
reformation of France shall not be made with bloodshed; nothing shall be
destroyed but NAMES, such as the names of Monks, Carmalites, Augustines,
Dominicans, Jacobins, Franciscans, Capuchins, Jesuites, Minimes, and an
infinite company of others, whose number it is not easy to define, and
which the Holy Ghost denotes by the number seven, which is the
number of perfection, to signify that the order of monks and nuns shall
perish forever. This is an institution so degenerated from its first
original, that it is become the arm of Antichrist. These orders cannot
perish one with another. These great events deserve to be distinguished
from all others, for they will change THE WHOLE FACE OF THE WORLD.
What can we think, when we compare this prophecy, if
you please to call it such, with the history of the French revolution, but
that God in the fulfillment has given us indubitable proof that these
servants of his, in their exposition of this passage, gathered the true
and simple meaning of the Holy Spirit? They could not have written to
support any particular theory, for neither do any of them appear to have
any on this point. They wrote while it was yet a prophecy. They could have
no national prejudice, for they were from different nations. Surely, we
must admire their harmony, and the power and goodness of God, in thus
giving them knowledge of these events spoken of in this prophecy, so as to
tell the manner, place, and time when these things should be fulfilled.
Let me quote to you from Rev. John Willison, minister
of Dundee, who published a number of sermons under the title of "The
Balm of Gilead." In one of these, he says,
Before Antichrist's
fall, one of the ten kingdoms which supported the beast shall undergo a
marvelous revolution. Rev.xi.13: 'And the same hour was there a great
earthquake, and the tenth part of the city fell, and in the earthquake
were slain of men seven thousand: and the remnant were affrighted, and
gave glory to the God of heaven;' by which tenth part is to be
understood one of the ten kingdoms into which the great city, Romish Babylon, was divided. This
many take to be the kingdom of
France, it being the tenth and last of the kingdoms, according to
the rise, and that which gave Rome the denomination of the beast with ten
horns, and also it being the only one of the ten that was never conquered
since its rise. However unlikely this, and other prophesied events, may
appear at the time, yet the almighty hand of the only wise God can soon
bring them about when least expected.
These sermons were published
in A. D. 1742, more than fifty years before the fulfillment of the
prediction.
Many other authors of great celebrity, who wrote many
years before the French revolution, might be quoted, who all believed that
the two witnesses would be slain in France, that the earthquake would be
in that kingdom, and that there the names, titles, or orders of men would
be abolished. And nearly all of them fixed the time between the years 1785
and 1795. I will give one more extract on this point, from DR. GILL, taken
from a sermon on the answer to the question, "Watchman, what of
the night?" published in A. D. 1748, almost one hundred years
since. He says,
If it should be asked, What time it is with us now?
whereabout we are? and what is yet to come of this night? as a faithful
watchman, I will give you the best account I can. I take it, we are in the
Sardian church state, in the last part of it, which brought on the
Reformation, and represents that. We are in the decline of that state, and
there are many things said of that church which agree with us, as that we
have a name that we live, and are dead, &c. - It is a sort of twilight
with us, between clear and dark, between day and night. As to what of the
night is yet to come, or what will befall the churches, and will bring on
the dismal night before us; - they are the slaying of the witnesses, and
the universal spread of Popery all over Christendom; and the latter is the
unavoidable consequence of the former. The slaying of the witnesses, which
I understand not so much in a literal sense, or of a corporal death,
though there may be many slain in this sense when it will be, but in a
civil sense, with respect to their ministry being silenced by their
enemies, and neglected by their friends; - this is an affair that is not
yet over: the witnesses have not yet finished their testimony; they are
still prophesying, though in sackcloth or under some discouragements;
whereas it will be, when they have finished their testimony, and at the
close of the 1260 days or years of Antichrist's reign, that they will be
killed. - The ruin of Antichrist will immediately follow the rising and
ascension of these witnesses; for at the same hour that they shall ascend,
will be a great earthquake, or a revolution in the papal state; and the
tenth part of the city, or of the Romish jurisdiction, shall fall; that
is, one of its ten horns, kings or kingdoms belonging to it, and perhaps
the kingdom of FRANCE is meant, and seven thousand men of name will
be slain, and the rest be affrighted, and give glory to God; nothing of
which has yet been done. From all of which it may be concluded, that the
slaying of witnesses is yet to come, and will make the dismal part of that
night we are entering into, and which will be accompanied with a universal
spread of Popery: - but her 'plagues shall come in one day, death, and
mourning, and famine, and she shall be utterly burnt with fire.' Before
the utter destruction of Antichrist, he shall go forth with great fury
to destroy, and utterly to make away many; yea, he shall plant the
tabernacles of his palace between the seas, in the glorious holy mountain,
or the mountain of delight, of holiness; and what place is there, in all
the globe, to which this description so well answers as Great Britain? (I
answer, Italy.) This will be done before, and but a little before, his
ruin; for it follows, 'yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help
him.'
If these doctors had lived in this day, with the same
spirit in which they then wrote, they would not have called my views
"moonshine," for they harmonize to a charm; or if our D. D.s had
a little more of their Bible knowledge, some of their modesty, and less of
their own sufficiency, they would not bluster in "resolutions,"
nor be blinded in "lunar rays," but, like our author above
quoted, they would be able to give the time of night, that the people
might be prepared for the morning.
These writers which I have quoted, and a number more
which might be given with equal propriety, predicted, on the authority of
the Bible, a grand and very important revolution in France, a change of
ecclesiastical and civil polity, the introduction of a new system, fatal
to Popery and tyranny, but friendly to the liberty, peace, and happiness
of man. They foretold that this revolution should be effected, not in the
ordinary course of things, nor by the ministry of the gospel, but by a
peculiar dispensation of God; by a sudden convulsion, like an earthquake,
attended with the destruction of names, titles, dignities, orders, and the
humiliation of the French monarchy, falling from the support of Papacy.
They foretold her subsequent exaltation, liberty of the nations, spread of
the gospel, and the death and resurrection of the witnesses. They fixed
the time between 1785 and 1795. Love, who wrote in 1651, prophesied that
Babylon should begin to fall in 1790. Rev. Robert Fleming, minister of the
Scotts church in London, in a discourse on the rise and fall of Papacy,
published in 1701, says,
The French monarchy will begin to be
humbled as soon as 1794.
What can all this mean? Can you not see the signs of
the times in all this? If not, your eyes are indeed closed that you cannot
see, and your ears stopped that you will not hear; and in such an hour as
ye think not, it will come upon you. Oh! you scoffers, and scorners of the
cry, "Behold, the Bridegroom cometh!" - what will you do?
(Miller's Works, vol. 1, pp. 203-211)
The above page was found at https://www.pickle-publishing.com/papers/french-revolution.htm on November 21, 2024.
© 2004
Pickle Publishing
|